A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
five. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General along with counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to your recovery of sleeping supplements on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore continues to be developed before the Court wherein the sleeping products were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected within the liver but not inside the abdomen. Consequently, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel with the complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led towards the recovery of a motorcycle.
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
limitation of liability for the extent of the cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination in the time of appointment of service but after the appointment too. The disparity from the pay back scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is within the obvious negation with the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that though contemplating the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all of the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored through the respondent department just to increase favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were regarded for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their jobs with DCFS.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by click here setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This may well occur several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement in the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
[3] For example, in England, the High Court along with the Court of Appeals are each bound by their have previous decisions, however, since the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court from the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Despite the fact that in practice it not often does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent will be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom ruled that it and the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the legislation for virtually thirty years.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of your Pakistan Constitution supplies original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are proven by executive companies based on statutes.